Anna ,Bold ,Caddy ,Dan and Een are sibli...

Asked by balletgirl1 on 08-05-2020 17:54:41
Question posted in the General Law category relating to Eastern Cape
Question value: R 150.00

Anna ,Bold ,Caddy ,Dan and Een are siblings. Anna lived in our childhood home which she inherited after the death of the mother. 

Anna died without a will and is not married and has no kids. 

Een also died and is survived by two adult children , S and R. 

Therefore, the remaining siblings and S and R  are the benefacaries. 

Bold met with Dan and was told that Bold himself and Caddy do not want the house. Bold proposed that if Dan wants the house he can take it but the house price will be deducted from the monetary inheritance of Dan from the estate.

S and R are unware of the proposal. 

Also, Bold is not the executor of the estate his daughter Samantha is the executor. And Samantha has never communicated anything with Dan and S and R. 

Can you please advise on this situation. Is this the proper proposed procedure? I am not sure. The house is a family home, where we all grew up. 

Thanks

Ask your OWN Legal Question!

Answer to the Question

Posted by Att. Patrick on 09-05-2020 00:45:17

Hi there and thank you for your question,

I am a practicing attorney based in South Africa and I will assist you with your question. Please feel free to ask as many follow up questions in order to clarify your question. If you have a new question, you must please open a new thread.

Okay, so the first thing is that because Anna died intestate, without a husband or children, her estate devolves in terms of the laws of intestate succession on her surviving siblings. i.e. Bold, Caddy and Dan.

I am assuming that Een is already passed away. If this is the case, then she won't inherit anything, and her kids (S & R) won't inherit anything. The only way for S & R to inherit something is if Anna died leaving a Will, and that Will specifically said that she leaves her assets to her siblings with representations per stirpes. But she didn't. 

If this is a wrong assumption, and Een passed away AFTER Anna died, then Een's estate is the beneficiary of Anna's estate. Ultimately, S & R will receive that portion of the inheritance, however it is wrong to say that S & R are Anna's heirs, because they are not directly. Indirectly yes. 

What Bold proposed to Dan is perfectly legal, however Dan and Caddy would need to agree to this. If there was a Will, we would call this a Redistribution Agreement. Since there is no Will, as long as each of Bold, Caddy and Dan receive an equal value of the estate, the Master won't care how the actual assets are split up. 

If Een passed away after Anna, then Een's executor would need to agree with Bold, Caddy and Dan in relation to the above asset split.

Whatever agreement is reached must be communicated to the executor so that she can include same in the Estate Late Account which needs to be filed with the Master. 

If Bold, Caddy, Dan and Een's executor reach an agreement AFTER there has been a distribution of assets, then this does NOT need to be communicated to Samantha. 

Does this all make sense?

If there is a part of the answer which you need more advice on, or clarity please continue in this same thread instead of opening a new question.

Att. Patrick

Please remember this is a dialog if you have follow up questions please use the REPLY button and ask. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. I hope you found my answer helpful, and you have finished asking your questions, please click on the GREEN ACCEPT button in order to mark the question as closed.

Answer Accepted

This answer was accepted on 07-07-2020 11:18:52

If you would like to view the entire answer, you will need to either login or register a FREE account.

Disclaimer

DISCLAIMER: Advice or answers from Lawyers on SA Legal Advice are not substitutes for the proper advice of an Lawyer. SA Legal Advice is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Lawyer who assists with your question is not your Lawyer, and the response above is not to be considered to be legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains. The responses above are from individual Lawyers, not SA Legal Advice. The site and services are provided “as is”. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.