Good dayOn the 10th of December we submi...

Asked by Tinus on 14-01-2022 09:06:05
Question posted in the General Law category relating to Gauteng

Good day

On the 10th of December we submitted an OTP for a property. In the OTP it states that "the agreement is subject to the Purchaser being able to obtain, within 30 days of signature a loan for the full amount."It also states that "Only in the event of a loan approval not being granted (for the full amount) will the suspensive condition not be herein be deemed not to be fulfilled and the agreement will lapse and terminate automatically and become null and void"

In December Bank A approved a loan, but only for 90% of the purchase price.

Bank B yesterday approved a loan for the full amount, but at a higher interest rate. But this is obviously after the 30days lapsed.

We do not wish to proceed with the transaction. And if I understand this correctly, the 30days lapsed without us getting finance for the full amount, (even though we got finance for the full amount later), meaning that the contract is null and void?

Message from the Lawyer

Posted by Att. Patrick on 14-01-2022 10:22:57

Hi there and thank you for your question, 

I am a practicing attorney based in South Africa and I will assist you with your question. Please feel free to ask as many follow-up questions in order to clarify your question. If you have a new question, you must please open a new thread. 

If Bank A approved a loan for less than the full amount, then that can't be seen as a fulfilment of the suspension condition. 

If the suspension condition had not been fulfilled within the 30 days of signature, then the agreement is automatically null and void and is of no further force or effect. In law, it is dead. You can't bring it back to life. If the parties want, they can sign a new agreement. But the old agreement is throw away. 

If Bank B approved a loan for the full amount after the 30 day period, that action means nothing. Because the agreement is already null and void, Bank B's actions can't be seen as a fulfilment of the suspension condition.

You are 100% correct in your reasoning, as stated above.

If there is a part of the answer which you need more advice on, or clarity please continue in this same thread instead of opening a new question. 

Att. Patrick 

Please remember this is a dialog if you have follow-up questions please use the REPLY button and ask. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted to be answered. I hope you found my answer helpful, and you have finished asking your questions, please click on the GREEN ACCEPT button in order to mark the question as closed.

If you would like to view the entire answer, you will need to either login or register a FREE account.


DISCLAIMER: Advice or answers from Lawyers on South African Legal Advice are not substitutes for the proper advice of an Lawyer. South African Legal Advice is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Lawyer who assists with your question is not your Lawyer, and the response above is not to be considered to be legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains. The responses above are from individual Lawyers, not South African Legal Advice. The site and services are provided “as is”. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.